Unit rate for sports infrastructure sits in the district's top percentile

Robust z-score on peer cohort evaluated this work against 602 comparable sanctions in Karnataka for the same category and financial year. Per-unit cost of an asset sits in the upper tail of comparable works in the same district and quarter after size normalisation. The residual for this record falls outside the learned tolerance, and the contribution breakdown below isolates which measured features carried the score.

1. 01Unit rate vs district SoR+31.0
2. 02Quantity declared per lakh+21.9
3. 03Peer-cohort robust z-score+17.7
4. 04Material index adjustment+15.8
5. 05Quarter-on-quarter rate drift+6.6

Contributions are additive against the cohort baseline; they sum to the composite score and are recomputed whenever the underlying record changes.

1. 22 Feb 2024Work sanctioned by the District Authority₹1.09 Cr · Mysuru Rural Engineering Service
2. 22 Feb 2024First instalment released to the implementing agency₹36.43 L
3. 22 Mar 2026D-02 fired during the nightly scoring runRobust z-score on peer cohort · confidence 0.81
4. 22 Mar 2026Alert routed to State Nodal AuthorityResponse window 7 days